Day 7 — Getting it to think step by step
For anything with more than one step, asking for the working improves the answer.
Why it helps
A model produces text one piece at a time, each piece conditioned on what came before. If it commits to an answer immediately, it has to get there in one leap. If it lays out the steps first, each step becomes context for the next - and the answer at the end is better grounded.
The simplest version
Numbering the steps yourself
"Think step by step" on its own helps a little. Naming the steps helps far more, because you are supplying the analytical structure rather than hoping it picks a good one.
Ask for the working, then check it
Splitting a big task
For anything substantial, several small prompts beat one large one. You inspect the output at each stage instead of discovering a wrong assumption at the end.
Asking it to critique itself
Models are noticeably better at finding holes in an argument than at avoiding them. Drafting and then critiquing in a separate step is a genuinely useful two-pass workflow.
Try these yourself
- Turn "why did sales drop?" into a five-step prompt.
- Write a debugging prompt that asks for the cause before the fix.
- Split a month-end reporting task into four separate prompts.
- Explain why asking for the working makes errors easier to catch.
- Ask a model to critique a paragraph of your own analysis.
